The Impact of ChatGPT on History Education: An Analysis of Misinformation and Historical Reasoning in High Schools

Reza Renggana Hamdani, Mildrett de Fatima Jalane, Ibrahim Pandu Ame

Abstract


The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, especially Large Language Models such as ChatGPT, has brought major changes in the world of education, including in history learning at the secondary school level. ChatGPT is often used by students to organize assignments, summarize events, and understand historical concepts quickly and practically. However, the study found that most students use ChatGPT passively without undergoing the information verification process, which has an impact on potential misinformation and decreased historical thinking skills. This research uses a qualitative approach with an exploratory case study conducted at SMA Negeri 6 Tasikmalaya City, involving students in grades XI and XII and two history teachers. Data was obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. The results show that ChatGPT often provides historical information that is general, biased, and sometimes factually incorrect, including in untraceable references. In addition, students who rely on ChatGPT show a decreasing tendency to compile chronologies, explain cause and effect, and understand the context of historical events. These findings show the importance of teacher assistance in directing the use of AI in a critical and literacy manner. This study recommends pedagogical strategies that integrate digital literacy, resource evaluation, and historical source-based learning as mitigating steps. ChatGPT should be positioned not as the primary source, but as an exploratory tool that is reflexively directed so as not to perpetuate misinformation and still support the formation of students' historical reasoning.

Keywords


ChatGPT; History Learning; Misinformation; Historical Reasoning; Digital Literacy;

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Matos, W. Santos, E. Zdravevski, P. J. Coelho, I. M. Pires, and F. Madeira, “A systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in education: Emerging trends and challenges,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 15, p. 100571, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100571.

L. Ilomäki, S. Paavola, M. Lakkala, and A. Kantosalo, "Digital competence - an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research," Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 655-679, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4.

R. Vuorikari, S. Kluzer, and Y. Punie, "DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens," Publ. Off. Eur. Union, 2022, https://doi.org/10.2760/115376.

N. Wark, and M. Ally, “An emergent pedagogical framework for integrating emergent technologies into curriculum design,” Emerging technologies and pedagogies in the curriculum, pp. 89-111, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_6.

W. K. Monib, A. Qazi, R. A. Apong, M. T. Azizan, L. De Silva, and H. Yassin, “Generative AI and future education: a review, theoretical validation, and authors’ perspective on challenges and solutions,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 10, p. e2105, 2024, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2105.

P. Seixas and T. Morton, The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. Toronto, ON, Canada: Nelson Education, 2013, https://archive.org/details/bigsixhistorical0000seix/page/n6/mode/1up.

S. S. Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Temple University Press, 2001, https://books.google.co.id/books?-id=tN9nQgAACAAJ&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks_s .

E. van Laar, A. J. A. M. van Deursen, J. A. G. M. van Dijk, and J. de Haan, "The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review," Comput. Human Behav., vol. 72, pp. 577-588, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010.

H. Jo, "From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education," Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1-15, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00471-4.

Y. Yang, S. Hussin, and H. Hashim, "Revising with intelligence: ChatGPT feedback and its impact on EFL students' revision and self-efficacy," Forum Linguist. Stud., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 352-367, Jul. 2025, https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9845.

S. Sok and K. Heng, "Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for using ChatGPT in higher education: A literature review," J. Digit. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2024, https://doi.org/-10.30935/jdet/14027.

E. Kasneci, K. Seßler, S. Küchemann, M. Bannert, D. Dementieva, F. Fischer, et al., "ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education," Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 103, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

D. O. Eke, "ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?," J. Responsible Technol., vol. 13, Apr. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060.

S. Wineburg and C. Monte-Sano, "'Famous Americans': The Changing Pantheon of American Heroes," J. Am. Hist., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1186-1202, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2307/25095326.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publ., 2018, https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf.

R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publ., 2017, https://books.google.co.id/books?id=6DwmDwAAQBAJ&printsec=front-cover&hl=id.

L. A. Palinkas, S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood, "Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research," Adm. Policy Ment. Heal. Ment. Heal. Serv. Res., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 533-544, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.

I. Etikan, S. A. Musa, and R. S. Alkassim, "Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling," Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11648/-j.ajtas.20160501.11.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications, 2013, https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf

Y. S. Lincoln, E. G. Guba, and J. J. Pilotta, “Naturalistic inquiry,” Int. J. Intercult. Relat., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 438–439, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8.

A. Sami, I. Uddin, N. Khan, M. Bilal, M. Shahid, and I. Ali, "Getting to Know ChatGPT: An Introduction to Implementation and Working.," in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Computing Technol., Tools and Applications (ICTAP-23), Peshawar, Pakistan, May 9–11, 2023, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/-372890276_Getting_to_Know_ChatGPT_An_Introduction_to_Implementation_and_Working.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.59247/jtped.v1i1.19

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Reza Renggana Hamdani, Mildrett de Fatima Jalane, Ibrahim Pandu Ame

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Journal of Technological Pedagogy and Educational Development
ISSN: xxxx-xxxx
Organized by Peneliti Teknologi Teknik Indonesia
Published by Peneliti Teknologi Teknik Indonesia
Website: https://ejournal.jtped.org/ojs/index.php/jtped
Email: alfian_maarif@ieee.org
Address: Jl. Empu Sedah No. 12, Pringwulung, Condongcatur, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia